The provision of bottled water for patient consumption and assessment of the microbial risk remains a blind spot for infection prevention teams and water safety groups. Few consider that bottled water could be a source of Pseudomonas aeruginosa or other waterborne pathogens.
There are times when bottled water could be safer and a logistically favourable option for provision of drinking water rather than from the municipal water supplied tap. However, when assessing the considerable evidence within published literature, those times are likely infrequent and typically linked to emergency situations affecting the municipal supply quality such as flooding, “boil water” notices, unexpected supply outage, burst water mains, etc.
Bacterial Growth in Bottled Waters
Microbiological quality is particularly relevant when assessing bottled water suitability for patient consumption, yet it remains common for patients, even those with low immune competency, to have access to and/or be provided with commercial bottled water.
Bacteria may reproduce significantly in the bottle after the bottling process, especially during periods of non-refrigerated storage, transport and on exposure to sunlight. Bacteria detected in bottled drinking water have been linked to outbreaks.
It has been recommended not to provide immunocompromised individuals with bottled water due to microbiological findings, however other concerns including chemical and environmental contaminants may also be relevant – particularly for long term consumption which could result in cumulative health effects.
Increasing Trend in Bottled Water Consumption
There has been increasing consumption of bottled water over recent years as consumers are encouraged to drink more for their health and hydration. Marketing descriptive such as “Pure,” “Natural” and “Fortified” reassure the purchaser of their favourite brand’s virtuous qualities. What do these words really mean? It is important to realise that “Pure” does not mean microorganism-free.
Our municipal drinking water supply is considered “wholesome” and is typically well monitored, tested and released after meeting stringent requirements. Once over the threshold of a building however, drinking water quality may decline due to multiple factors such as contact with inappropriate materials, the size and complexity of the water system, long pipe runs, stagnancy, poor temperature control, inappropriate user behaviour etc. Therefore water quality at the tap may be variable depending on its environment and management in those last few meters of pipework.
Many studies have looked at contamination within drinking water at the municipal source, at the tap, and within different types of bottled drinking waters. Bottled waters are often found lacking in comparison with the municipal supply.
Understanding the Contaminant Risk from Bottled Water
In 2020, investigators from the United States Geological Survey, Food and Drug Administration, Environmental Protection Agency and National Institute of Environmental Health Science examined the inorganic, organic and microbial contaminants in a selection of individual serving bottled waters from 30 different brands commonly available in the United States. This study was undertaken to gain better understanding of contaminant risk to human health from bottled water, and has been reported in December 2022 by Bradley et al.,in the Environment International journal.
A variety of water source locations (e.g. US and imported, spring and purified tap water), different treatments and packaging materials (e.g. glass, plastic, aluminium, carton) were assessed. The authors reported the presence of regulated and unregulated organic and inorganic chemicals, plus microorganisms were routinely detected in the bottled waters investigated – “2 or more detections of potential human-health concern often observed per sample”.
Arsenic and uranium were frequently detected in spring-sourced bottled waters at 87% and 74% respectively, with excess nitrate in 22%. Most frequently detected organics were chlorine disinfectant by-products, which were mainly found in purified bottled water but also in some spring and a range of volatile organic compounds (VOC) were found in both. Pesticides were infrequently found, although one brand had levels more than double the International Bottle Water Association Code of Practice.
At least one opportunistic waterborne pathogen was detected in 80% (24/30) bottled waters studied. There is considerable variability in contaminant levels, but the purchaser is certainly getting more that they thought within the bottle.
Patient Exposure Risk Considerations
Multiple publications confirm that market driven perceptions of bottled water as being “better” than tap water are not supported in the literature.
What is the safe level of exposure for our vulnerable patient populations? It is likely that the risk of exposure is significantly less in most municipal supplied drinking waters, however, comparable data is needed in order to make effective consumer risk based decision making. There appears a ranking of microbiological risk from
- spring source bottled water (highest) to
- bottled purified tap water to
- municipal supplied drinking water at the tap,
- to boiled and cooled water and finally
- bottled sterile water (lowest)
To support Water Safety Groups and Infection Prevention Teams to review and assess the appropriate provision of drinking water in their healthcare populations, and to highlight the hazards that bottled drinking waters pose, the below summary of key publications from the last 15 years helps formulate emergency drinking water plans for when something catastrophic has happened to the municipal tap water supply.
Bottled Water Chemical and Biological Contamination:
Author & Date | Summary |
Nabizaden et al., 2022 | Ranked 71 bottled water brands by their level of carcinogenic chemical compounds followed by their bacteriological levels |
Angnunavuri et al., 2022 | The mean lifetime cancer risk was calculated from 600 sachet and bottled waters sampled from two “high end” brands. The presence of phthalates and pathogenic bacteria were found to be at levels requiring risk mitigation |
Tran et al., 2022 | Pseudomonas aeruginosa detected in bottled water samples by molecular detection method |
Brumfield et al., 2020 | Molecular and culture analysis of different brands of bottled water including sparkling natural mineral water in glass bottles, non-mineral spring water in plastic bottles, artesian water in plastic bottles, reprocessed tap water in plastic bottles. Different microbial populations and abundancies were present. The majority in sparkling natural mineral water was Betaproteobacteria, with Burkholderiales being dominant, whereas in non-mineral bottled water Gammaproteobacteria was in the majority with Alteromonadales and Enterobacteriales dominant. Propionibacterium were present in both types. These waters were not considered appropriate for vulnerable patients. |
Tischner et al., 2021 | Bottled Water Dispensers (large communal single bottles positioned above a chiller and dispensing tap) were analysed, and fungi detected in 86% of samples with more than half heavily contaminated. Proliferation occurs in the bottle and then dispensed. As with most opportunistic pathogens, the authors concluded that the risk to populations of “sensitive age groups, patients with immunodeficient conditions, cystic fibrosis, patients with oral lesions plus may also pose a risk to visitors to healthcare institutions” |
Cerna-Cortes et al., 2019 | 111 samples from bottled waters analysed: 62% and 29% positive for total coliforms and faecal coliforms respectively, plus 29% positive for fast-growing Non-Tuberculous Mycobacteria. “Most of the purified bottled water samples analysed in the study had unsatisfactory microbiological quality” |
Caskey et al., 2018 | Pseudomonas aeruginosa detected in 3% of bottled natural mineral water destined for supply to patients with cystic fibrosis |
Waterborne Pathogen Outbreaks from Bottled Water Sources:
Author & Date | Summary |
Guix et al., 2020 | Bottled mineral water the source of a norovirus outbreak in Spain |
Wang et al., 2012 | Bottled water the source of an Escherichia coli gastroenteritis outbreak amongst university students in China. Drinking boiled water was inversely associated with being a case |
Lai et al., 2011 | The top 7 risk factors associated with gastroenteritis outbreaks in Taipei: taking antacidsother members of the household being infectedattending a banquet/buffeteating outdrinking bottled batereating honey peacheseating oysters |
Naze et al., 2010 | Pseudomonas aeruginosa outbreak linked to use of bottled mineral water in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit in France |
Eckmanns et al., 2008 | An outbreak of hospital-acquired Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in six Intensive Care Units within a German University Hospital which was sourced to contaminated bottled water |
Beware good intentions of providing a refreshing “Pure” and “Natural” drink for your patients and ensure your water policy and water safety plan has strict guidance on when bottled water is appropriate for which patient use. Do not use it as standard or to ease logistics unless you have taken steps to risk assess this approach and assured the microbiological quality of each batch of bottled water intended for patient use as a minimum.
What events would you consider bottled drinking water would replace tap water for patient supply? How do you restrict inappropriate water quality from reaching your patients? We hope this Blog will help you in assessing and understanding if bottled water is appropriate for use with your patient groups, if you would like to discuss this information further, please contact us at harperwater.com
References:
Akhbarizadeh R, Dobaradaran S, Schmidt TC, Nabipour I, Spitz J. Worldwide bottled water occurrence of emerging contaminants: A review of the recent scientific literature. J Hazard Mater. 2020 Jun 15;392:122271. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122271. Epub 2020 Feb 14. PMID: 32311916. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32311916/
Angnunavuri PN, Attiogbe F, Dansie A, Mensah B. Evaluation of plastic packaged water quality using health risk indices: A case study of sachet and bottled water in Accra, Ghana. Sci Total Environ. 2022 Aug 1;832:155073. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155073. Epub 2022 Apr 7. PMID: 35398415. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35398415/
Bradley PM, Romanok KM, Smalling KL, Focazio MJ, Evans N, Fitzpatrick SC, Givens CE, Gordon SE, Gray JL, Green EM, Griffin DW, Hladik ML, Kanagy LK, Lisle JT, Loftin KA, Blaine McCleskey R, Medlock-Kakaley EK, Navas-Acien A, Roth DA, South P, Weis CP. Bottled water contaminant exposures and potential human effects. Environ Int. 2022 Dec 15;171:107701. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107701. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 36542998. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36542998/
Brumfield KD, Hasan NA, Leddy MB, Cotruvo JA, Rashed SM, Colwell RR, Huq A. A comparative analysis of drinking water employing metagenomics. PLoS One. 2020 Apr 9;15(4):e0231210. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231210. PMID: 32271799; PMCID: PMC7145143. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32271799/
Caskey S, Stirling J, Moore JE, Rendall JC. Occurrence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in waters: implications for patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). Lett Appl Microbiol. 2018 Jun;66(6):537-541. doi: 10.1111/lam.12876. Epub 2018 Apr 16. PMID: 29537700. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29537700/
Cerna-Cortes JF, Cortes-Cueto AL, Villegas-Martínez D, Leon-Montes N, Salas-Rangel LP, Rivera-Gutierrez S, Lopez-Hernandez D, Helguera-Repetto AC, Fernandez-Rendon E, Gonzalez-Y-Merchand JA. Bacteriological quality of bottled water obtained from Mexico City small water purification plants: Incidence and identification of potentially pathogenic nontuberculous mycobacteria species. Int J Food Microbiol. 2019 Oct 2;306:108260. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2019.108260. Epub 2019 Jul 5. PMID: 31302488. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34358021/
Chow SJ, Ojeda N, Jacangelo JG, Schwab KJ. Detection of ultrashort-chain and other per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in U.S. bottled water. Water Res. 2021 Aug 1;201:117292. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2021.117292. Epub 2021 May 27. PMID: 34118648. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34118648/
Eckmanns T, Oppert M, Martin M, Amorosa R, Zuschneid I, Frei U, Rüden H, Weist K. An outbreak of hospital-acquired Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection caused by contaminated bottled water in intensive care units. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008 May;14(5):454-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2008.01949.x. Epub 2008 Feb 22. PMID: 18294245. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18294245/
Guix S, Fuentes C, Pintó RM, Blanco A, Sabrià A, Anfruns-Estrada E, Garrido VR, Alonso M, Bartolomé R, Cornejo T, Pumarola T, Bosch A. Infectivity of Norovirus GI and GII from Bottled Mineral Water during a Waterborne Outbreak, Spain. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 Jan;26(1):134-137. doi: 10.3201/eid2601.190778. PMID: 31855546; PMCID: PMC6924916. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31855546/
International Bottled Water Association. Bottled water code of practice. https://bottledwater.org/ibwa-code-of-practice/
Krachler M, Shotyk W. Trace and ultra-trace metals in bottled waters: survey of sources worldwide and comparison with refillable metal bottles. Sci Total Environ. 2009 Jan 15;407(3):1089-96. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.10.014. Epub 2008 Nov 6. PMID: 18990431. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18990431/Lisle and Priscu, 2004
Luo Q, Liu ZH, Yin H, Dang Z, Wu PX, Zhu NW, Lin Z, Liu Y. Migration and potential risk of trace phthalates in bottled water: A global situation. Water Res. 2018 Dec 15;147:362-372. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.10.002. Epub 2018 Oct 5. PMID: 30326398. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30326398/
Lai CC, Wu FT, Ji DD, Mu JJ, Yang JR, Chiu KT, Lin WY, Li CY, Fu YP, Chen WT, Lee BC, Jiang DD, Yen MY, Wu HS. Gastroenteritis in a Taipei emergency department: aetiology and risk factors. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011 Jul;17(7):1071-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03377.x. Epub 2010 Nov 18. PMID: 20854428. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20854428/
Nabizadeh R, Yousefzadeh S, Yaghmaeian K, Alimohammadi M, Mokhtari Z. Bottled water quality ranking via the multiple-criteria decision-making process: a case study of two-stage fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Mar;29(14):20437-20448. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16931-7. Epub 2021 Nov 4. PMID: 34735703. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34735703/
Naze F, Jouen E, Randriamahazo RT, Simac C, Laurent P, Blériot A, Chiroleu F, Gagnevin L, Pruvost O, Michault A. Pseudomonas aeruginosa outbreak linked to mineral water bottles in a neonatal intensive care unit: fast typing by use of high-resolution melting analysis of a variable-number tandem-repeat locus. J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Sep;48(9):3146-52. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00402-10. Epub 2010 Jun 23. PMID: 20573865; PMCID: PMC2937704. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20573865/
Pierce G, Gonzalez S. Mistrust at the tap? Factors contributing to public drinking water (mis) perception across US households. Water Policy, 19 (1) (2017), pp. 1-12, 10.2166/wp.2016.143. https://iwaponline.com/wp/article-abstract/19/1/1/20521/Mistrust-at-the-tap-Factors-contributing-to-public?redirectedFrom=fulltext
Tischner Z, Sebők R, Kredics L, Allaga H, Vargha M, Sebestyén Á, Dobolyi C, Kriszt B, Magyar D. Mycological Investigation of Bottled Water Dispensers in Healthcare Facilities. Pathogens. 2021 Jul 10;10(7):871. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10070871. PMID: 34358021; PMCID: PMC8308914. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34358021/
Tran DH, Tran HT, Pham TNM, Phung HTT. Direct multiplex recombinase polymerase amplification for rapid detection of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in food. Mol Biol Res Commun. 2022 Mar;11(1):1-10. doi: 10.22099/mbrc.2021.41503.1664. PMID: 35463821; PMCID: PMC9012432. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35463821/
Wang R, Cheng H, Zong J, Yu P, Fu W, Yang F, Shi G, Zeng G. An outbreak of acute gastroenteritis associated with contaminated bottled water in a university – Jiangxi, China, 2012. Western Pac Surveill Response J. 2012 Nov 13;3(4):20-4. doi: 10.5365/WPSAR.2012.3.4.009. PMID: 23908934; PMCID: PMC3729088. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23908934/Luo et al., 2018
Real M, Molina-Molina JM, Jiménez-Díaz I, Arrebola JP, Sáenz JM, Fernández MF, Olea N. Screening of hormone-like activities in bottled waters available in Southern Spain using receptor-specific bioassays. Environ Int. 2015 Jan;74:125-35. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2014.10.006. Epub 2014 Oct 27. PMID: 25454229. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25454229/
Saleh MA, Abdel-Rahman FH, Woodard BB, Clark S, Wallace C, Aboaba A, Zhang W, Nance JH. Chemical, microbial and physical evaluation of commercial bottled waters in greater Houston area of Texas. J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng. 2008 Mar;43(4):335-47. doi: 10.1080/10934520701795400. PMID: 18273738. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18273738/
Stanhope, J., McAuley, K., Cook, A. et al. Estimating Trihalomethane Concentrations in Bottled Spring Water. Expo Health 2020. 12 (4): 877–881. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12403-020-00350-z
Wang C, Ye D, Li X, Jia Y, Zhao L, Liu S, Xu J, Du J, Tian L, Li J, Shen J, Xia X. Occurrence of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in bottled water and assessment of the associated risks. Environ Int. 2021 Oct;155:106651. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106651. Epub 2021 May 23. PMID: 34033976. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34033976/